Official NHA Assessment
Race 5: COLORTRADE PAINTS MR 66 HANDICAP (Open)
Line Horse
Higher Purpose
Reference for assessment
Exact Matches
0 / 16
Calculated = Official
Close Matches
8 / 16
Within 2 points
Significant Diffs
2 / 16
More than 5 points
Detailed Assessment
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pos Horse Age Weight Fin Lengths WFA Pre Race Rating New Adj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 The Bayou 7 54.5 1 0.00 0.0 60 64 60 +0 2 Riccardo 7 55.5 2 0.05 0.0 57 66 66 +9 3 Higher Purpose 4 58.0 3 1.65 6.0 62 62 62 +0 4 Pedro 6 58.0 4 1.85 0.0 63 74 74 +11 5 Imitation Game 4 60.0 5 2.00 6.0 66 66 66 +0 6 Pineview 4 54.0 6 3.40 6.0 54 52 52 -2 7 Lake Como 3 60.0 7 4.20 8.5 67 59 59 -8 8 Quest For The Best 4 54.5 8 5.00 6.0 55 52 52 -3 9 A Time To Remember 4 56.5 9 7.00 6.0 59 56 56 -3 10 Callmemrgreenlight 3 54.0 10 8.50 8.5 55 46 46 -9 11 Charge Down 4 55.5 11 9.10 6.0 57 54 54 -3 12 Lord Of The Manor 5 48.0 12 11.20 0.0 50 51 51 +1 13 Protea Pride 4 54.0 13 22.60 6.0 54 51 51 -3 99 Coromandel 4 59.0 99 0.00 6.0 - 61 61 +0 99 A Whole New World 4 58.0 99 0.00 6.0 - 59 59 +0 99 Justfortheepenny 5 53.5 99 0.00 0.0 - 62 62 +0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Horse-by-Horse Comparison
| Pos | Horse | Pre-Rating | Official New | Calculated | Discrepancy | WFA (kg) | Line Horse | Calculation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Bayou | 60 | 58 | 60 | -2 | 0.0 | - | |
| 2 | Riccardo | 57 | 68 | 66 | +2 | 0.0 | - | |
| 3 | Higher Purpose Line | 62 | 61 | 62 | -1 | 6.0 | ||
| 4 | Pedro | 63 | 72 | 74 | -2 | 0.0 | - | |
| 5 | Imitation Game | 66 | 61 | 66 | -5 | 6.0 | - | |
| 6 | Pineview | 54 | 50 | 52 | -2 | 6.0 | - | |
| 7 | Lake Como | 67 | 61 | 59 | +2 | 8.5 | - | |
| 8 | Quest For The Best | 55 | 76 | 52 | +24 | 6.0 | - | |
| 9 | A Time To Remember | 59 | 53 | 56 | -3 | 6.0 | - | |
| 10 | Callmemrgreenlight | 55 | 45 | 46 | -1 | 8.5 | - | |
| 11 | Charge Down | 57 | 51 | 54 | -3 | 6.0 | - | |
| 12 | Lord Of The Manor | 50 | 48 | 51 | -3 | 0.0 | - | |
| 13 | Protea Pride | 54 | 54 | 51 | +3 | 6.0 | - | |
| 99 | Coromandel | - | 59 | 61 | -2 | 6.0 | - | |
| 99 | A Whole New World | - | 65 | 59 | +6 | 6.0 | - | |
| 99 | Justfortheepenny | - | 65 | 62 | +3 | 0.0 | - |
Assessment Methodology
Calculation Steps:
- Identify Line Horse - consistent performer used as reference
- Calculate WFA Allowance based on age, distance, and month
- Apply Drag Adjustment for beaten margin
- Calculate Actual Weight Performance:
Weight - Drag - WFA - Compare to Line Horse to determine race rating
- Apply special rules (maiden caps, layoff allowance)
Key Formulas:
- Drag Effect: Varies by distance (see Benchmarks page)
- 1 length ≈ 1kg at 1 mile (1600m)
- WFA Scale: Based on Admiral Rous's 1855 table
- Rating Points: 1kg = 2 rating points